United States v. Hoffman

417 F. App'x 352
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMarch 18, 2011
Docket10-4975
StatusUnpublished

This text of 417 F. App'x 352 (United States v. Hoffman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Hoffman, 417 F. App'x 352 (4th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Rodney T. Hoffman pled guilty pursuant to a plea agreement to one count of storage of hazardous waste without a permit, in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 6928(d)(2)(A) (2006). On appeal, he challenges the district court’s denial of his request for a downward departure under Application Notes 7 and 8 to the Commentary for U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 2Q1.2 (2009). We dismiss the appeal.

This court does not have jurisdiction to review the denial of a downward departure so long as the district court recognized the authority to depart. See United States v. Bayerle, 898 F.2d 28, 30-81 (4th Cir.1990). “Because the district court’s refusal to depart downward followed its conclusion that the evidence did not support a departure, its ruling on this issue is not renewable on appeal.” United, States v. Quinn, 359 F.3d 666, 682 (4th Cir.2004).

Because we conclude that the district court recognized the authority to depart and found that the evidence did not support a departure, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
417 F. App'x 352, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-hoffman-ca4-2011.