United States v. Hoffman
This text of 313 F. App'x 601 (United States v. Hoffman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER . CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Jesse Hoffman, III, appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration of the order reducing his sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Hoffman, No. 3:01 —cr—00015—jpj—1 (W.D.Va. Apr. 22, 2008), and the reasons expressed in our recent decision in United States v. Dunphy, 551 F.3d 247, 253-56 (4th Cir.2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
313 F. App'x 601, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-hoffman-ca4-2009.