United States v. Hoffman
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6328
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
TERRY C. HOFFMAN, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Elkins. Robert Earl Maxwell, District Judge. (CR-91-84, CA-96-16-2)
Submitted: June 20, 1996 Decided: July 9, 1996
Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Terry C. Hoffman, Appellant Pro Se. David Earl Godwin, Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss on the reasoning
of the district court. United States v. Hoffman, Nos. CR-91-84; CA- 96-16-2 (N.D.W. Va. Jan. 18, 1996). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Hoffman (United States v. Hoffman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.