United States v. Hoffman
This text of United States v. Hoffman (United States v. Hoffman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6328
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
TERRY C. HOFFMAN,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern Dis- trict of West Virginia, at Elkins. Robert Earl Maxwell, District Judge. (CR-91-84, CA-96-16-2)
Submitted: June 20, 1996 Decided: July 9, 1996
Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Terry C. Hoffman, Appellant Pro Se. David Earl Godwin, Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his
28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the
district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss on the reasoning
of the district court. United States v. Hoffman, Nos. CR-91-84; CA- 96-16-2 (N.D.W. Va. Jan. 18, 1996). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci- sional process.
DISMISSED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Hoffman, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-hoffman-ca4-1996.