United States v. Hoes

CourtDistrict Court, District of Columbia
DecidedJune 7, 2010
DocketCriminal No. 2010-0067
StatusPublished

This text of United States v. Hoes (United States v. Hoes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Hoes, (D.D.C. 2010).

Opinion

FILED

JUN 7 ‘ 2010 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT mem U_S_ Dismct & Bank,uptcy FOR THE DISTRICT OF CC)LUMBIA Courts for the Distri°ct of Co|umbla UNITED STATES OF Al\/[ERICA v. Cn`minal Action No.: lO-O067 (RMU)

LAWRENCE HOES, Defendant. ORDER

This matter is before the court on the Report and Recominendation of Magistrate Judge Kay recommending that the trial court accept the defendant’s plea of guilty. Based on a plea hearing conducted by Judge Kay on May 28, 2010, and in accordance with the requirements of Federal Rule of Crimiiial Procedure l l, Judge Kay found that the plea of guilty was knowingly and voluntarily made by the defendant, who was competent and fully understood the nature and the consequences of entering such a plea. Having reviewed the Report and Recoinmendation and Judge Kay’s findings, it is this 7th day of June, 2()1(), hereby

ORDERED that Judge Kay’s Report and Recominendation is adopted in full; and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the defendant’s plea of guilt is accepted; and it is

ORDERED that the sentencing in this matter shall be held on July 26, 2010 at ll:3O a.m.; and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the probation officer assigned to this case disclose the draft pre-sentence investigation report to the parties on or before June 28, 2010; and it is

ORDERED that counsel submit objections (if any) to the probation officer on or before July 6, 2010; and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the probation officer disclose to the parties and file with the court the final pre-sentence iiivestigation report on or before July 13, 201 O; and it is

ORDERED that any party wishing to submit a memorandum in aid of sentencing must

do so no later than July ]9, 201 O, with responses (ifany) due on or before July 2l , 20lO. These memoranda and any responses thereto must cite to supporting legal authority.

SO ORDERED.

icardo M. Urbina United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Hoes, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-hoes-dcd-2010.