United States v. Hodge

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Hodge

294 F. App'x 43

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedSeptember 24, 2008

Docket08-7092

StatusUnpublished

This text of 294 F. App'x 43 (United States v. Hodge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Hodge, 294 F. App'x 43 (4th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

David L. Hodge, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for modification of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Hodge, No. 3:94-cr-00036-H-2 (E.D.N.C. June 19, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

David L. Hodge, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for modification of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Hodge, No. 3:94-cr-00036-H-2 (E.D.N.C. June 19, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

294 F. App'x 43, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-hodge-ca4-2008.