United States v. Hoberek

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedAugust 17, 2004
Docket03-7872
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Hoberek (United States v. Hoberek) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Hoberek, (4th Cir. 2004).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-7872

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

STANLEY HOBEREK,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., District Judge. (CR-99-13)

Submitted: August 12, 2004 Decided: August 17, 2004

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Stanley Hoberek, Appellant Pro Se. Robert H. McWilliams, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Stanley Hoberek appeals the district court’s order

denying his Fed. R. Crim. P. 35 motion for correction of illegal

sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. See United States v. Hoberek, No. CR-99-13 (N.D.W.

Va. Nov. 7, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Hoberek, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-hoberek-ca4-2004.