United States v. Hobbs

287 F. 157, 1923 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1711
CourtDistrict Court, S.D. Florida
DecidedFebruary 2, 1923
DocketNos. 99, 100
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 287 F. 157 (United States v. Hobbs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Hobbs, 287 F. 157, 1923 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1711 (S.D. Fla. 1923).

Opinion

CALL, District Judge.

The indictments in these cases charge that the defendants in each case transported a woman in interstate commerce for “the purpose of prostitution and debauchery ‘and other immoral purposes/ ” and with intent and purpose “to induce, entice and compel the said woman to become a prostitute and to give herself up to debauchery ‘and to engage in other immoral practices.’ ” The defendant in each case challenged the indictment, on the ground that the use of the words “other immoral purposes” makes the indictment defective.

The indictment states an offense under the statute, in stating the •purpose of the interstate traveling for the purpose of prostitution and debauchery. The addition of the words “other immoral purposes” is surplusage, and will not make the*indictment bad. No proof could be offered of any immoral purpose, except such as are specifically mentioned, to wit, prostitution and debauchery.

The demurrer will therefore be overruled in each of the above cases.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. McClung
187 F. Supp. 254 (E.D. Louisiana, 1960)
United States v. Lewis
110 F.2d 460 (Seventh Circuit, 1940)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
287 F. 157, 1923 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1711, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-hobbs-flsd-1923.