United States v. Hite

540 F. App'x 2
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided October 24, 2013·No. No. 13-3072·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, the motion for release pending appeal filed by appellant, the memorandum of law and fact filed by appellee, and the reply. It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed July 30, 2013, be affirmed. Appellant has not “clearly shown that there are exceptional reasons why [his] detention would not be appropriate.” 18 U.S.C. § 3145(c). We express no opinion whether appellant has satisfied the factors set out in 18 U.S.C. § 3143(b).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The [3] Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Hite, 540 F. App'x 2 (D.C. Cir. 2013).

540 F. App'x 2 (United States v. Hite) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Lovo
263 F. Supp. 3d 47 (District of Columbia, 2017)
United States v. Hite
72 F. Supp. 3d 29 (District of Columbia, 2014)
United States v. Smith
34 F. Supp. 3d 541 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 2014)