United States v. Hinojosa

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided March 4, 2004·No. 96-40104·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-40104 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ALBERT HINOJOSA,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas (C-95-CR-120-1)

February 24, 1997

Before JOHNSON, EMILIO GARZA, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Albert T. Honojosa has appealed his conviction for possessing

a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). There is no merit

ot his contentions that the district court deprived him effective

assistance of counsel or of a fair trial. See Lockhart v.

Fretwell, 506 U.S. 364, 372 (1993); United States v. Bermea, 30

F.3d 1539, 1569 (5th Cir. 1994), cert. denied, 115 S. Ct. 1113,

1825 (1995).

AFFIRMED.

* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Hinojosa, (5th Cir. 2004).

United States v. Hinojosa (United States v. Hinojosa) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lockhart v. Fretwell
506 U.S. 364 (Supreme Court, 1993)
United States v. Bermea
30 F.3d 1539 (Fifth Circuit, 1994)