United States v. Hinkson

72 F. App'x 972
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided August 20, 2003·No. No. 02-41632·Published

Opinion

BY THE COURT:

Owen Garth Hinkson, federal prisoner # 17785-038, has filed a motion seeking to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) in his appeal from the denial of his motion seeking to withdraw his guilty plea, which he filed after his conviction became final and his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion was denied. Hinkson’s motion to withdraw his guilty plea was unauthorized. See Fed. R.Crim. P. 32(e)(2000). Hinkson’s appeal from the district court’s denial of that motion is frivolous because it lacks issues of arguable merit. See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir.1983). Accordingly, his motion for IFP is DENIED. See Jackson v. Dallas Police Dep’t, 811 F.2d 260, 261 (5th Cir.1986). Because, in denying Hinkson’s IFP motion, we have determined that the instant appeal is frivolous, the appeal must be DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

IFP MOTION DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Hinkson, 72 F. App'x 972 (5th Cir. 2003).

72 F. App'x 972 (United States v. Hinkson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ira Jackson, Jr. v. Dallas Police Department
811 F.2d 260 (Fifth Circuit, 1986)
Howard v. King
707 F.2d 215 (Fifth Circuit, 1983)