United States v. Hinckley Jr., John W

174 F.3d 238, 335 U.S. App. D.C. 402, 1999 WL 241777
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Hinckley Jr., John W. Read the opinion of the Court — 140 F.3d 277
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided April 27, 1999·No. 97-3183·Published

Opinions

Circuit Judges GINSBURG, SENTELLE, KAREN LeCRAFT HENDERSON and RANDOLPH would grant the petition for rehearing en banc.

A statement of Circuit Judge KAREN LeCRAFT HENDERSON dissenting from the denial of rehearing en banc, joined by Circuit Judges GINSBURG and SENTELLE, is attached.

Before: WALD, WILLIAMS and HENDERSON, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

April 27, 1999.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Hinckley Jr., John W, 174 F.3d 238, 335 U.S. App. D.C. 402, 1999 WL 241777 (D.C. Cir. 1999).

174 F.3d 238 (United States v. Hinckley Jr., John W) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Lewis C. Ecker, II
479 F.2d 1206 (D.C. Circuit, 1973)
United States v. James R. Snyder, (Three Cases)
529 F.2d 871 (D.C. Circuit, 1976)
United States v. Lewis C. Ecker, II
543 F.2d 178 (D.C. Circuit, 1977)
United States v. Hinckley
725 F. Supp. 616 (District of Columbia, 1989)
United States v. Hinckley
967 F. Supp. 557 (District of Columbia, 1997)
Hinckley v. United States
163 F.3d 647 (D.C. Circuit, 1999)