United States v. Hinckley Jr., John W
174 F.3d 238, 335 U.S. App. D.C. 402, 1999 WL 241777
Opinions
Circuit Judges GINSBURG, SENTELLE, KAREN LeCRAFT HENDERSON and RANDOLPH would grant the petition for rehearing en banc.
A statement of Circuit Judge KAREN LeCRAFT HENDERSON dissenting from the denial of rehearing en banc, joined by Circuit Judges GINSBURG and SENTELLE, is attached.
Before: WALD, WILLIAMS and HENDERSON, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
April 27, 1999.
. Upon consideration of appellee’s petition for rehearing filed March 1, 1999, and of the response thereto, it is
ORDERED that the petition be denied.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Hinckley Jr., John W, 174 F.3d 238, 335 U.S. App. D.C. 402, 1999 WL 241777 (D.C. Cir. 1999).
174 F.3d 238 (United States v. Hinckley Jr., John W) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. Lewis C. Ecker, II
479 F.2d 1206 (D.C. Circuit, 1973)
United States v. James R. Snyder, (Three Cases)
529 F.2d 871 (D.C. Circuit, 1976)
United States v. Lewis C. Ecker, II
543 F.2d 178 (D.C. Circuit, 1977)
United States v. Hinckley
725 F. Supp. 616 (District of Columbia, 1989)
United States v. Hinckley
967 F. Supp. 557 (District of Columbia, 1997)
Hinckley v. United States
163 F.3d 647 (D.C. Circuit, 1999)