United States v. Hinckley
Opinion
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
On December 20, 2013, the Court issued an Opinion in the above-captioned case granting in part and denying in part the Hospital’s request to expand Mr. Hinck-ley’s conditions of release. See Docket No. 445. It granted the Hospital’s request to expand Mr. Hinckley’s visits to Williams-burg from 10 to 17 days a month and set forth a series of conditions to govern those visits. By separate Order issued that same day, see Docket No. 446, the Court ordered the Hospital to prepare a proposed order consistent with the Opinion, circulate the proposed order to counsel for the parties for their comments (consistent •with the Opinion), and seek to reach consensus before submitting the order to the Court for signature.
The parties were able to reach consensus on most issues, but identified three areas of disagreement in subsequent filings and emails, and in a conference call held with the Court on February 14, 2014. Upon careful consideration of the submissions of the parties and the arguments and representations made in the conference call, the Court has resolved the three disputed questions and incorporated its decisions in a separate Order issued today. With respect to paragraphs 21 and 25 of that Order, the Court has adopted the language proposed by the Hospital or the government. With respect to certain additional language that the government has requested concerning a separate matter, the Court agrees with the patient and therefore denies the government’s request.
The most contentious issue in discussions among the parties relates to paragraph 21 governing Mr. Hinckley’s use of the internet while at his mother’s home in Williamsburg. There are valid considerations on both sides of the argument, particularly in view of the increased time Mr. Hinckley will be spending in Williamsburg under the Court’s December 20, 2013 *8 Opinion and Order and the Order issued today. The Court welcomes further filings with respect to this matter from the parties as appropriate, but suggests that the arguments for and against any modifications to the restrictions now contained in paragraph 21 would have to be supported by the testimony-in person or by affidavit-of health care professionals and perhaps other experts. Should Mr. Hinckley wish to pursue this matter prior to the conclusion of the eight visits contemplated by the Court’s Opinion and Order, he may do so.
SO ORDERED.
ORDER
For the reasons stated in the Opinion issued on December 20, 2013, it is hereby,
ORDERED that the Court will permit. the following:
1. Mr. Hinckley will be allowed conditional releases of 17 days each month to his mother’s home outside the metropolitan Washington D.C. area with the purpose of acclimating him to his mother’s community and permitting him to engage in activities discussed in the December 20, 2013 Opinion. The success of each visit will be thoroughly assessed by the Hospital before a subsequent visit is permitted. If Mr. Hinckley successfully completes eight 17-day visits, the court would consider a further (e) letter from the Hospital.
2.Mr. Hinckley will be permitted to drive unaccompanied while in Williamsburg as long as he is using the vehicle to travel to destinations where people will be expecting him, such as to mental health treatment appointments, approved volunteer and employment activities, as well as to any specific social or educational activities arranged by him and Mr. Weiss.
3. During each day of the 17-day visits, Mr. Hinckley will be permitted up to six unsupervised outings lasting up to 4 hours each outside his mother’s housing subdivision, for social, recreational, shopping, and dining activities, or for the purpose of securing other related activities, between 9:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m. 4. During these unaccompanied outings, Mr. Hinckley will avoid traveling to government centers in Richmond or to areas where the President or members of Congress may be visiting.
5. Mr. Hinckley will be allowed to volunteer at Eastern State Hospital for up to five days a week, depending on the availability of suitable work activities and will be allowed to engage in other work with hospital approval.
6. The Hospital agrees to notify the Court and counsel for the parties if Mr. Hinckley engages in new volunteer activities or employment, with a description of the duties and duty hours.
7. Mr. Hinckley will be allowed two 120 minute unaccompanied walks, daily within his mother’s subdivision between the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. standard time and 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. daylight savings time.
8. The Court will continue to require detailed itineraries to be provided by the Hospital in advance for at least the first four 17-day visits. Should these itineraries (prepared by Mr. Hinckley, Mr. Hyde, and Mr. Weiss) contain the kinds of social and other interactive activities that show progress, the Court will consider a motion from *9 the Hospital or Mr. Hinckley to modify the requirement of detailed itineraries, submitted, under seal, to the Court and to counsel for the parties.
9. Mr. Hinckley will continue to complete a daily log of his activities while in Williamsburg.
10. Mr. Hinckley may be driven between Washington, D.C. and Williamsburg by a professional driver without his mother or siblings in the vehicle.
11. The Hospital will provide 7-day notice to the Court, the government, and Mr. Hinckley’s counsel prior to each visit to Williamsburg.
12. The Hospital will provide 1-day notice to the Court, the government, and Mr. Hinckley’s counsel prior to Mr. Hinckley taking part in any Hospital staff-accompanied outing.
13. Dr. Giorgi-Guarnieri will continue to serve as Mr. Hinckley’s psychiatrist in the Williamsburg area. Mr. Hinckley will meet with Dr. Giorgi-Guarnieri weekly during his visits of 17 days. Additional visits may occur as clinically necessary. Dr. Giorgi-Guarnieri will monitor Mr. Hinckley for any signs of deterioration or decompensation in his mental condition and will be especially alert for anger, psychosis, depression, any ideas of elopement, endangerment to self or others, noncompliance with conditions of release, or rejection of the supervision provided to Mr. Hinckley by his responsible persons. If any such items are detected, she will telephone the Hospital. Dr. Gior-gi-Guarnieri will continue to assess and monitor the risk factors identi- . fied in the Hospital’s checklists, which she will complete and return to the Hospital after each visit, along with written feedback summarizing her contact with Mr. Hinckley. Dr. Giorgi-Guarnieri also will participate in post-visit telephone conference calls with the Hospital treatment team to discuss Mr. Hinckley’s progress, and will participate by phone in the Hospital treatment team’s Individual Recovery Plan meetings scheduled every two months for Mr. Hinckley. Dr. Giorgi-Guarnieri will verify with Mr. Hinckley that he has been taking his medications as prescribed. If necessary, Dr.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
35 F. Supp. 3d 4 (United States v. Hinckley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.