United States v. Hill
This text of 20 C.M.A. 125 (United States v. Hill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Military Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Opinion of the Court
We granted review to consider the propriety of the acceptance of the accused’s plea of guilty to larceny and housebreaking, in violation of Articles 121 and 130, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§921 and 930, respectively. For the reasons set out in our opinion in United States v Palos, 20 USCMA 104, 42 CMR 296, decided this date, we conclude there was no error in the acceptance of the accused’s [126]*126plea of guilty. Accordingly, the decision of the United States Army Court of Military Review is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
20 C.M.A. 125, 20 USCMA 125, 42 C.M.R. 317, 1970 CMA LEXIS 698, 1970 WL 7083, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-hill-cma-1970.