United States v. Hill

26 F. Cas. 318, 1 Cranch 521
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia
DecidedDecember 15, 1808
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 26 F. Cas. 318 (United States v. Hill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Hill, 26 F. Cas. 318, 1 Cranch 521 (circtddc 1808).

Opinion

But THE COURT

(DUCKETT, Circuit Judge, absent},

having more fully considered the Acts of Assembly of 1717, c. 13, and 1751, e. 14, § 4, were of opinion that a slave is not a competent witness against a free-born mulatto, not under a state of temporary servitude. It is also clear, that the slave cannot be admitted under the third section of the act of 1717. It cannot be implied, from the exclusion (in the second section) of slaves as witnesses against a white person, that they may be admitted against a free person of color; for the principles of the civil law, and of the laws of every country where slavery is tolerated, exclude, them as witnesses against a free person.

Verdict, “Not guilty.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Gray
26 F. Cas. 17 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia, 1829)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
26 F. Cas. 318, 1 Cranch 521, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-hill-circtddc-1808.