United States v. Hill
This text of 26 F. Cas. 318 (United States v. Hill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
having more fully considered the Acts of Assembly of 1717, c. 13, and 1751, e. 14, § 4, were of opinion that a slave is not a competent witness against a free-born mulatto, not under a state of temporary servitude. It is also clear, that the slave cannot be admitted under the third section of the act of 1717. It cannot be implied, from the exclusion (in the second section) of slaves as witnesses against a white person, that they may be admitted against a free person of color; for the principles of the civil law, and of the laws of every country where slavery is tolerated, exclude, them as witnesses against a free person.
Verdict, “Not guilty.”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
26 F. Cas. 318, 1 Cranch 521, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-hill-circtddc-1808.