United States v. Hill

372 F. App'x 750
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedMarch 29, 2010
Docket07-10011
StatusUnpublished

This text of 372 F. App'x 750 (United States v. Hill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Hill, 372 F. App'x 750 (9th Cir. 2010).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Defendant-appellant Robert Paul Hill (“Hill”) appeals from a final judgment convicting him of one count of being a felon in possession of a firearm and ammunition. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

The facts of this case are known to the parties. We do not repeat them.

We review “all sentencing decisions” for an abuse of discretion. United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 993 (9th Cir.2008) (en banc). The district court properly exercised its discretion in sentencing Hill to 120 months imprisonment and declining to grant a downward departure pursuant to Section 5K2.13 of the Sentencing Guidelines. See U.S.S.G. § 5K2.13; see also United States v. Davis, 264 F.3d 813, 815-16 (9th Cir.2001) (holding that courts lack discretion to depart downward under Section 5K2.13 if incarceration is needed “to protect the public”).

AFFIRMED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. James Ernest Davis
264 F.3d 813 (Ninth Circuit, 2001)
United States v. Carty
520 F.3d 984 (Ninth Circuit, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
372 F. App'x 750, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-hill-ca9-2010.