United States v. Hill
This text of 163 F. App'x 540 (United States v. Hill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Johnathan Luther Hill appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying his motion for writ of error audita querela. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291.
We affirm the district court’s order because Hill’s conviction became final in 1999, and this court has held that United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), does not apply retroactively to convictions that became final prior to its publication. See
[541]*541United States v. Cruz, 423 F.3d 1119, 1121 (9th Cir.2005) (per curiam).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
163 F. App'x 540, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-hill-ca9-2006.