United States v. Hill
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-7711
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DONALD COREY HILL, a/k/a Corey Melvin, a/k/a Tank,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Charlottesville. Norman K. Moon, District Judge. (3:03-cr-00112-nkm-1)
Submitted: May 29, 2008 Decided: June 3, 2008
Before TRAXLER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Donald Corey Hill, Appellant Pro Se. Nancy Spodick Healey, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Donald Corey Hill appeals the district court’s order, as
amended, denying his motion filed pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 36.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. United States v. Hill, No. 3:03-cr-00112-nkm-1 (W.D. Va.
Oct. 4, 2007; Jan. 9, 2008). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Hill (United States v. Hill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.