United States v. Hill

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Hill. Read the opinion of the Court — 158 F. App'x 436
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 3, 2008·No. 07-7711·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-7711

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DONALD COREY HILL, a/k/a Corey Melvin, a/k/a Tank,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Charlottesville. Norman K. Moon, District Judge. (3:03-cr-00112-nkm-1)

Submitted: May 29, 2008 Decided: June 3, 2008

Before TRAXLER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Donald Corey Hill, Appellant Pro Se. Nancy Spodick Healey, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Donald Corey Hill appeals the district court’s order, as

amended, denying his motion filed pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 36.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. United States v. Hill, No. 3:03-cr-00112-nkm-1 (W.D. Va.

Oct. 4, 2007; Jan. 9, 2008). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Hill, (4th Cir. 2008).

United States v. Hill (United States v. Hill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.