United States v. Hidalgo-Peralta

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Hidalgo-Peralta. Read the opinion of the Court — 166 F. App'x 762
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided June 21, 2006·No. 04-50383·Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT June 21, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-50383 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

VALENTIN HIDALGO-PERALTA,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-03-CR-2342-ALL-DB --------------------

Before STEWART, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Counsel for Valentin Hidalgo-Peralta (Hidalgo) has moved for

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders

v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Hidalgo has not filed a

response to counsel’s motion. Our independent review of the

brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issues for appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,

counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Hidalgo-Peralta, (5th Cir. 2006).

United States v. Hidalgo-Peralta (United States v. Hidalgo-Peralta) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)