United States v. Hicks

District Court, District of Columbia·Decided April 5, 2017·No. Criminal No. 2015-0129·Published

Opinion

CONSENT FOR N|OD|F|CAT|ON OF SUPERV|SED RELEASE/PROBAT|ON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

forthe _ FILED

District of Columbla APR 5 - 2017

C|erk, U. S. District& Bankruptcy Courts for the Distr|ct of Columbla

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

QQB§QLMDMQLB

Defendant

) ) vs. ) Criminal NO. wci ) ) )

CONSENT TO MODIFY PROBATION/SUPERVISED RELEASE

The parties agree the defendant‘s conditions of supervised release/probation should be modified and being no objection thereto, IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT the defendant's conditions of` supervised release/probation are modified . ' ;- : . - -.. : . .. . ; .

Daleclviewi bt, WFK

Failure to file timely objections to the fin ` _s and recommendations set forth in this report may waive your right of appeal from an order of the District Court adopting such findings and recommendations See Thomas v. Am, 474 U.S. 140 (1985).

U,S. Magistrate Ju ge

The magistrate judge having recommended that the conditions of the defendant's supervised release/probation be modified and there being 110 objection lhereto. IT IS ORDERED that the 7A recommendation of the magistrate judge 13 acceptch//)/ //x j /1/7" j /%?_` /%C€/// g f` 5 a/\/€¢_er‘/

Dared: Wé; 29/? /%/%{ /W

U S District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Hicks, (D.D.C. 2017).

United States v. Hicks (United States v. Hicks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Thomas v. Arn
474 U.S. 140 (Supreme Court, 1986)