United States v. Hicks
This text of United States v. Hicks (United States v. Hicks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Case: 24-50936 Document: 41-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/11/2025
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED June 11, 2025 No. 24-50936 Lyle W. Cayce Summary Calendar Clerk ____________
United States of America,
Plaintiff—Appellee,
versus
Brandon Hicks,
Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 5:24-CR-51-1 ______________________________
Before King, Southwick, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Brandon Joseph Hicks has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Hicks has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We
_____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. Case: 24-50936 Document: 41-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/11/2025
No. 24-50936
concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Hicks, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-hicks-ca5-2025.