Home/Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces/United States v. Herrmann

United States v. Herrmann

76 M.J. 174, 2017 CAAF LEXIS 252
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Herrmann. Read the opinion of the Court — 76 M.J. 304 →
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces·Decided March 21, 2017·No. No. 16-0599/AR·Published

Opinion

CCA 20131064. On consideration of the motion filed by Professor Lauren E. Bartlett to appear pro hac vice as counsel of record for amicus curiae Christopher M. Calpin, and motion by amicus curiae Christopher M. Calpin to submit oral argument, it is ordered that said motions are [175]*175hereby granted, and that amicus curiae will be allotted 10 minutes to present oral argument.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Herrmann, 76 M.J. 174, 2017 CAAF LEXIS 252 (Ark. 2017).

76 M.J. 174 (United States v. Herrmann) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.