United States v. Hernandez-Roman

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Hernandez-Roman. Read the opinion of the Court — 981 F.3d 138
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·Decided December 1, 2020·No. 18-2133E·Errata

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

No. 18-2133

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Appellee,

v.

JOMAR HERNÁNDEZ-ROMÁN,

Defendant, Appellant.

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this Court, issued on December 1, 2020, is amended as follows: On page 12, lines 16 - 18, delete the entire sentence and citation and replace with "We acknowledge, as the defendant posits, that the residual clause of section 924(c) is unconstitutionally vague. See United States v. Davis, 139 S. Ct. 2319, 2336 (2019); see also Johnson, 576 U.S. 596-97."

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Hernandez-Roman, (1st Cir. 2020).

United States v. Hernandez-Roman (United States v. Hernandez-Roman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Davis
588 U.S. 445 (Supreme Court, 2019)