United States v. Hernandez-Pineda
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT April 18, 2007
Charles R. Fulbruge III No. 06-41155 Clerk Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
HILARIO HERNANDEZ-PINEDA,
Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:06-CR-157-ALL --------------------
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BENAVIDES, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Court-appointed counsel for Hilario Hernandez-Pineda has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Hernandez-Pineda has
not filed a response.
Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses
no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion
for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH
CIR. R. 42.2.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Hernandez-Pineda (United States v. Hernandez-Pineda) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.