United States v. Hernandez-Martinez

675 F. App'x 362
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 3, 2017·No. No. 16-7406·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Mauricio Hernandez-Martinez seeks to appeal the Government’s opposition to a motion in his criminal case. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. [363]*363541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). Hernandez-Martinez does not appeal from an order of the district court. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Hernandez-Martinez, 675 F. App'x 362 (4th Cir. 2017).

675 F. App'x 362 (United States v. Hernandez-Martinez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.
337 U.S. 541 (Supreme Court, 1949)