United States v. Hernandez-Lopez
Opinion
Case: 22-20625 Document: 00516786552 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/14/2023
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit
____________ FILED June 14, 2023 No. 22-20625 Lyle W. Cayce Summary Calendar Clerk ____________
United States of America,
Plaintiff—Appellee,
versus
Juan Antonio Hernandez-Lopez,
Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:21-CR-440-1 ______________________________
Before Wiener, Elrod, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam: * Juan Antonio Hernandez-Lopez appeals his conviction for illegal reentry into the United States after having been removed, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He contends that § 1326 violates the Fifth Amendment’s equal protection principles. Hernandez-Lopez concedes that this argument is foreclosed by our recent decision in United States v. Barcenas-Rumualdo, 53
_____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. Case: 22-20625 Document: 00516786552 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/14/2023
No. 22-20625
F.4th 859, 862 (5th Cir. 2022), and merely raises this issue to preserve it for further review. The government has moved without opposition for summary affirmance, or, alternatively, for an extension of time to file a brief. Because summary affirmance is appropriate, see Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis, 406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1969), the government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, the government’s alternative motion for an extension of time to file a brief is DENIED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Hernandez-Lopez (United States v. Hernandez-Lopez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.