United States v. Hernandez-Juarez

251 F. App'x 949
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Hernandez-Juarez. Read the opinion of the Court — 138 F. App'x 640
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided October 25, 2007·No. 06-20259·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Martin Hernandez-Juarez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Hernandez-Juarez has filed a response which incorporates a motion for the appointment of substitute counsel or, in the alternative, for leave to proceed pro se and for an extension of time to file a pro se brief.

Hernandez-Juarez’s motions are DENIED. Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Hernandez-Juarez’s response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Hernandez-Juarez, 251 F. App'x 949 (5th Cir. 2007).

251 F. App'x 949 (United States v. Hernandez-Juarez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)