United States v. Hernandez-Hernandez

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Hernandez-Hernandez. Read the opinion of the Court — 87 F. App'x 425
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided June 24, 2003·No. 02-21159·Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT June 24, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 02-21159 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CARMELO HERNANDEZ-HERNANDEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-01-CR-43-1 --------------------

Before DeMOSS, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Carmelo Hernandez-Hernandez (Hernandez), federal inmate

# 97237-079, appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to

set aside the $1000 fine which was imposed after he pleaded

guilty to being found present in the United States following

deportation. The propriety of Hernandez’s fine is not cognizable

under any postconviction motion. Because the district court was

without jurisdiction to consider the motion, the district court’s

denial of the motion is AFFIRMED. See United States v. Early, 27

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 02-21159 -2-

F.3d 140, 141 (5th Cir. 1994)(affirming district court’s denial

of motion to reduce sentence on the merits on alternative basis

of lack of jurisdiction).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Hernandez-Hernandez, (5th Cir. 2003).

United States v. Hernandez-Hernandez (United States v. Hernandez-Hernandez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.