United States v. Hernandez-Cabrera
This text of 42 F. App'x 923 (United States v. Hernandez-Cabrera) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Omar Hernandez-Cabrera appeals from his guilty plea conviction for illegal reentry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Hernandez-Cabrera’s has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), stating there are no arguable issues for review and seeking to withdraw as counsel of record. Hernandez-Cabrera has not filed a pro se supplemental brief. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no issues for review. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
42 F. App'x 923, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-hernandez-cabrera-ca9-2002.