United States v. Hernandez

545 F. App'x 678
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided November 21, 2013·No. No. 12-50575·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Any alleged breach of the terms of the plea agreement by the government did not amount to plain error because there is no basis to conclude that the sentence imposed by the district court was affected by the prosecution’s comments in its sentencing memorandum. See United States v. Gonzalez-Aguilar, 718 F.3d 1185, 1188-90 (9th Cir.2013). In addition, the district court offered sufficiently clear and individualized reasons for rejecting the plea agreement. See In re Morgan, 506 F.3d 705, 711-12 (9th Cir.2007).

AFFIRMED.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Hernandez, 545 F. App'x 678 (9th Cir. 2013).

545 F. App'x 678 (United States v. Hernandez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jackson Brumley v. Albert Brumley & Sons, Inc.
822 F.3d 926 (Sixth Circuit, 2016)