United States v. Hernandez
This text of 164 F. App'x 643 (United States v. Hernandez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
A review of the record and the opening brief indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard); United States v. Cruz, 423 F.3d 1119 (9th Cir.2005).
Accordingly, Appellee’s motion for summary affirmance is granted.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
164 F. App'x 643, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-hernandez-ca9-2006.