United States v. Hernandez

399 F. App'x 26
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided October 26, 2010·No. No. 10-40245·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Jose Clemente Hernandez presents arguments that he concedes are foreclosed by United States v. Bishop, 603 F.3d 279, 281-82 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 131 S.Ct. 272, 178 L.Ed.2d 180 (2010), which held that the imposition of a condition of supervised release ordering Hernandez “to participate in a mental health program as deemed necessary and approved by the probation officer” did not constitute plain error. The appellant’s unopposed motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Hernandez, 399 F. App'x 26 (5th Cir. 2010).

399 F. App'x 26 (United States v. Hernandez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hernandez v. United States
180 L. Ed. 2d 823 (Supreme Court, 2011)