United States v. Hernandez

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Hernandez. Read the opinion of the Court — 116 F.3d 725
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided February 18, 2000·No. 99-20789·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-20789 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSE GUADALUPE HERNANDEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-99-CR-256-1 - - - - - - - - - - February 17, 2000

Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose

Guadalupe Hernandez has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief

as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

Hernandez has received a copy of counsel’s motion and brief but

has not filed a response. Our independent review of the brief

and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly,

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED. Counsel is

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS

DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Hernandez, (5th Cir. 2000).

United States v. Hernandez (United States v. Hernandez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)