United States v. Hernandez

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 30, 2007·No. 07-7041·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-7041

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ALEJANDRO DEJESUS HERNANDEZ,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:91-cr-00139-CMH)

Submitted: August 23, 2007 Decided: August 30, 2007

Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and WILKINS and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alejandro DeJesus Hernandez, Appellant Pro Se. Bernard James Apperson, III, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Alejandro DeJesus Hernandez appeals a district court

order denying us untimely his Rule 60(b) motion seeking

reconsideration of the 1997 denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion.

We affirm because the district court was without jurisdiction to

consider the motion because Hernandez had not received

authorization from this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (2000). To

the extent Hernandez seeks authorization, we deny the request. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Hernandez, (4th Cir. 2007).

United States v. Hernandez (United States v. Hernandez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related