United States v. Hernan Gomez-Gutierrez

620 F. App'x 624
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedOctober 21, 2015
Docket14-30150
StatusUnpublished

This text of 620 F. App'x 624 (United States v. Hernan Gomez-Gutierrez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Hernan Gomez-Gutierrez, 620 F. App'x 624 (9th Cir. 2015).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Hernán Gomez-Gutierrez appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 180-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§' 841(a)(1) and 846. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Gomez-Gutierrez argues for the first time on appeal that the government breached the plea agreement by implicitly arguing for" a sentence greater than the one it had agreed to recommend. We review for plain error, United States v. Gonzalez-Aguilar, 718 F.3d 1185, 1187 (9th Cir.2013), and find none. Even assuming that the government’s isolated and brief comments breached the plea agreement, Gomez-Gutierrez has not shown that there is a reasonable probability that he would have received a shorter sentence *625 absent the government’s alleged breach. See id. at 1187-90.

AFFIRMED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Ubaldo Gonzalez-Aguilar
718 F.3d 1185 (Ninth Circuit, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
620 F. App'x 624, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-hernan-gomez-gutierrez-ca9-2015.