United States v. Hermes Guillen
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Hermes Adonay Guillen appeals from the 36-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for being a deported alien found unlawfully in the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Guillen contends that the sentence is substantively unreasonable because: (1) it was unreasonable for the district court to enhance his sentence based on his prior drug trafficking conviction; (2) he is unlikely to reoffend; and (3) he is culturally assimilated. In light of the totality of the circumstances and the factors under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), the sentence below the Guidelines range is substantively reasonable. See United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 993 (9th Cir.2008) (en banc).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
436 F. App'x 816 (United States v. Hermes Guillen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.