Home/Fifth Circuit/United States v. Herman Ackerman

United States v. Herman Ackerman

719 F.2d 1282, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 15110
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided November 21, 1983·No. 81-1571·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ON SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion May 2, 1983, 5 Cir.1983, 704 F.2d 1344).

Before BROWN, GOLDBERG and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:.

Treating the suggestion for rehearing en banc as a petition for panel rehearing, it is ordered that the petition for panel rehearing is DENIED. No . member of the panel nor Judge in regular active service of this Court having requested that the Court be polled on rehearing en banc (Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and Local Rule 35), the suggestion for Rehearing En Banc is DENIED. See United States v. Johnson, 718 F.2d 1317, 1324, n. 20 (5th Cir.1983) (en banc) (1981).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Herman Ackerman, 719 F.2d 1282, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 15110 (5th Cir. 1983).

719 F.2d 1282 (United States v. Herman Ackerman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Tri-State Hospital Supply Corp.
74 F. Supp. 2d 1311 (Court of International Trade, 1999)
United States v. Rockwell International Corp.
628 F. Supp. 206 (Court of International Trade, 1986)