United States v. Heriberto Laberrera Lopez, Arcardio Batista

453 F.2d 749
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 4, 1972
Docket71-1251
StatusPublished

This text of 453 F.2d 749 (United States v. Heriberto Laberrera Lopez, Arcardio Batista) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Heriberto Laberrera Lopez, Arcardio Batista, 453 F.2d 749 (9th Cir. 1972).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

We find no error, let alone plain error, in the court’s instructions.

The District Court finding that reasonable efforts were made by the Government to locate and produce the informant was not clearly erroneous.

There was ample evidence to support the verdict against Batista. While he was not shown to have been involved in the conspiracy (charged against appellants and four others) as it related to some earlier substantive violations noted in the indictment, he was clearly involved with the others in those substantive violations with which he was charged.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
453 F.2d 749, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-heriberto-laberrera-lopez-arcardio-batista-ca9-1972.