United States v. Hercules Antiques

44 C.C.P.A. 209
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals·Decided June 25, 1957·No. No. 4888·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinions

Worley, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court:

This is an appeal from the judgment of the United States Customs Court, First Division, Abstract 59910, sustaining the protest of appellees, and overruling the collector’s classification of the involved merchandise as an indirect importation from Czechoslovakia. The collector refused to give the importers the benefit of the trade agreement applicable to importations from Holland, but inapplicable to nations under Communist domination.

The pertinent parts of the statues and the Presidential proclamations are:

Paragraph 218 (f), Tariff Act of 1930: ' '

(f) Table and kitchen articles and utensils, and all articles of every description not specially provided for, composed wholly or in chief value of glass, blown or partly blown in the mold or otherwise, or colored, cut, engraved, etched, frosted, gilded, ground (except such grinding as is necessary for fitting stoppers or for purposes other than ornamentation), painted, printed in any manner, sandblasted, silvered, stained, or decorated or ornamented in any manner, whether filled or unfilled, or whether their contents be dutiable or free, 60 per centum ad valorem.

Paragraph 218 (f), as modified by T. D. 51898:

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Hercules Antiques, 44 C.C.P.A. 209 (ccpa 1957).

44 C.C.P.A. 209 (United States v. Hercules Antiques) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Mohammad Reza Ehsan
163 F.3d 855 (Fourth Circuit, 1998)
Coastal States Marketing, Inc. v. United States
646 F. Supp. 255 (Court of International Trade, 1986)
Belcrest Linens v. United States
573 F. Supp. 1149 (Court of International Trade, 1983)