United States v. Herbert Vincent Et Ux., Lorene Vincent

Fifth Circuit

United States v. Herbert Vincent Et Ux., Lorene Vincent

283 F.2d 517

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedNovember 16, 1960

Docket18397_1

StatusPublished

This text of 283 F.2d 517 (United States v. Herbert Vincent Et Ux., Lorene Vincent) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Herbert Vincent Et Ux., Lorene Vincent, 283 F.2d 517 (5th Cir. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In an action under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 1346, 2671-2680, arising out of an intersection collision between a United States mail truck and an automobile, the district court entered judgment against the United States in the amount of $3835.14. Its findings of fact are not clearly erroneous. Rule 52(a) F.R.Civ.P., 28 U.S.C.A. The judgment is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In an action under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 1346, 2671-2680, arising out of an intersection collision between a United States mail truck and an automobile, the district court entered judgment against the United States in the amount of $3835.14. Its findings of fact are not clearly erroneous. Rule 52(a) F.R.Civ.P., 28 U.S.C.A. The judgment is

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

283 F.2d 517, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-herbert-vincent-et-ux-lorene-vincent-ca5-1960.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack