United States v. Hensel, Bruckmann & Lorbacher
This text of 158 F. 645 (United States v. Hensel, Bruckmann & Lorbacher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this cause, which was argued on the first day of the term, I have examined the record with care and have reached the conclusion that the decision of the Board of General Appraisers [647]*647is correct. I do not think it necessary to add anything to their decision. It seems to me that it covers fully all the issues in controversy and in principle is in entire accord with the decision in the Crowley Case (55 Fed. 383, 5 C. C. A. 109). The decision of the Board is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
158 F. 645, 1896 U.S. App. LEXIS 2468, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-hensel-bruckmann-lorbacher-circtsdny-1896.