United States v. Hensel, Bruckmann & Lorbacher

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

United States v. Hensel, Bruckmann & Lorbacher

158 F. 645, 1896 U.S. App. LEXIS 2468

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York·Decided February 11, 1896·No. No. 1,800·Published

Opinion

COXE, District Judge.

In this cause, which was argued on the first day of the term, I have examined the record with care and have reached the conclusion that the decision of the Board of General Appraisers [647] is correct. I do not think it necessary to add anything to their decision. It seems to me that it covers fully all the issues in controversy and in principle is in entire accord with the decision in the Crowley Case (55 Fed. 383, 5 C. C. A. 109). The decision of the Board is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

COXE, District Judge.

In this cause, which was argued on the first day of the term, I have examined the record with care and have reached the conclusion that the decision of the Board of General Appraisers [647] is correct. I do not think it necessary to add anything to their decision. It seems to me that it covers fully all the issues in controversy and in principle is in entire accord with the decision in the Crowley Case (55 Fed. 383, 5 C. C. A. 109). The decision of the Board is affirmed.

United States v. Hensel, Bruckmann & Lorbacher, 158 F. 645, 1896 U.S. App. LEXIS 2468 (circtsdny 1896).

Pincite

158 F. 645 (United States v. Hensel, Bruckmann & Lorbacher) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related