United States v. Henry Ogle Watson

532 F.2d 1323
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Henry Ogle Watson. Read the opinion of the Court — 504 F.2d 849
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided April 22, 1976·No. 73-1539·Published

Opinion

OPINION

Before ELY and GOODWIN, Circuit Judges, and MURRAY, * District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

We originally reversed Watson’s conviction, holding that certain incriminating evidence should have been suppressed. 504 F.2d 849 (9th Cir. 1974). Judge Goodwin dissented.

The Supreme Court granted certiorari, reversed our decision, and remanded the cause for further proceedings in conformity with its opinion. 423 U.S. 411, 96 S.Ct. 820, 46 L.Ed.2d 598, 44 U.S.L.W. 4112 (1976).

The mandate of the Supreme Court has now been received. Pursuant to that mandate and our further consideration of Watson’s appeal in the light of the Supreme Court’s opinion, we now hold that Watson’s judgment of conviction should be, and the same hereby is,

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Henry Ogle Watson, 532 F.2d 1323 (9th Cir. 1976).

532 F.2d 1323 (United States v. Henry Ogle Watson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Watson
423 U.S. 411 (Supreme Court, 1975)
United States v. Henry Ogle Watson
504 F.2d 849 (Ninth Circuit, 1974)