United States v. Henry Ogle Watson

Ninth Circuit

United States v. Henry Ogle Watson

532 F.2d 1323

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedApril 22, 1976

Docket73-1539

StatusPublished

This text of 532 F.2d 1323 (United States v. Henry Ogle Watson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Henry Ogle Watson, 532 F.2d 1323 (9th Cir. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION

Before ELY and GOODWIN, Circuit Judges, and MURRAY, * District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

We originally reversed Watson’s conviction, holding that certain incriminating evidence should have been suppressed. 504 F.2d 849 (9th Cir. 1974). Judge Goodwin dissented.

The Supreme Court granted certiorari, reversed our decision, and remanded the cause for further proceedings in conformity with its opinion. 423 U.S. 411, 96 S.Ct. 820, 46 L.Ed.2d 598, 44 U.S.L.W. 4112 (1976).

The mandate of the Supreme Court has now been received. Pursuant to that mandate and our further consideration of Watson’s appeal in the light of the Supreme Court’s opinion, we now hold that Watson’s judgment of conviction should be, and the same hereby is,

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI