United States v. Henry Munoz

410 F. App'x 786
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 7, 2011
Docket10-40175
StatusUnpublished

This text of 410 F. App'x 786 (United States v. Henry Munoz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Henry Munoz, 410 F. App'x 786 (5th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Henry Munoz appeals the 151-month sentence he received following his guilty plea conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent tó distribute 1,084.4 kilograms of marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 and 846. Munoz argues that the district court erred in denying his motion for a downward departure, pursuant to U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual (U.S.S.G.) § 5K2.12, maintaining his contention that he provided false testimony at his co-defendant’s trial under duress as a result of his co-defendant’s threats against the lives of his family members.

This court lacks jurisdiction to review the denial of a downward departure motion made pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 5K2.12 unless the district court held a mistaken belief that it lacked authority to depart. United States v. Lucas, 516 F.3d 316, 350-51 (5th Cir.2008); United States v. Hernandez, 457 F.3d 416, 424 (5th Cir.2006). Munoz does not argue, and the record does not indicate, that the district court in this case mistakenly believed it was not authorized to grant the motion. Consequently, this court lacks jurisdiction to review the denial of the motion. See Lucas, 516 F.3d at 350-51; United States v. Buck, 324 F.3d 786, 797-98 (5th Cir.2003).

APPEAL DISMISSED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Buck
324 F.3d 786 (Fifth Circuit, 2003)
United States v. Hernandez
457 F.3d 416 (Fifth Circuit, 2006)
United States v. Lucas
516 F.3d 316 (Fifth Circuit, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
410 F. App'x 786, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-henry-munoz-ca5-2011.