United States v. Henry Mance Johnson

Fifth Circuit

United States v. Henry Mance Johnson

441 F.2d 733, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 10289

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided May 10, 1971·No. 31051·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

On this appeal, the appellant asserts error by the District Court because: (1) a certain portion of a transcript of testimony by a witness at a preliminary hearing in which the appellant was not a party was excluded by the District Court; (2) the United States Attorney’s office failed to locate a missing witness for the defense counsel; and (3) the District Court refused to continue the case because of the absence of this witness.

A perusal of the record in the case at hand shows no merit in any of appellant’s contentions, and the District Court is hereby

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

On this appeal, the appellant asserts error by the District Court because: (1) a certain portion of a transcript of testimony by a witness at a preliminary hearing in which the appellant was not a party was excluded by the District Court; (2) the United States Attorney’s office failed to locate a missing witness for the defense counsel; and (3) the District Court refused to continue the case because of the absence of this witness.

A perusal of the record in the case at hand shows no merit in any of appellant’s contentions, and the District Court is hereby

Affirmed.

United States v. Henry Mance Johnson, 441 F.2d 733, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 10289 (5th Cir. 1971).

Pincite

441 F.2d 733 (United States v. Henry Mance Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related