Home/Fifth Circuit/United States v. Henry Mance Johnson

United States v. Henry Mance Johnson

441 F.2d 733, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 10289
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedMay 10, 1971
Docket31051
StatusPublished

This text of 441 F.2d 733 (United States v. Henry Mance Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Henry Mance Johnson, 441 F.2d 733, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 10289 (5th Cir. 1971).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

On this appeal, the appellant asserts error by the District Court because: (1) a certain portion of a transcript of testimony by a witness at a preliminary hearing in which the appellant was not a party was excluded by the District Court; (2) the United States Attorney’s office failed to locate a missing witness for the defense counsel; and (3) the District Court refused to continue the case because of the absence of this witness.

A perusal of the record in the case at hand shows no merit in any of appellant’s contentions, and the District Court is hereby

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. Of New York, Defendant-Third Party v. Marine Mart, Inc., Third Party
431 F.2d 409 (Third Circuit, 1970)
John L. Jones v. State of Texas
441 F.2d 733 (Fifth Circuit, 1971)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
441 F.2d 733, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 10289, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-henry-mance-johnson-ca5-1971.