United States v. Henry Houston, Janie Pearl Houston, and Mary Houston Williams
This text of 216 F.2d 440 (United States v. Henry Houston, Janie Pearl Houston, and Mary Houston Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this case the district court reviewed an award of indemnity made by the Administrator of Veterans’ Affairs under the Servicemen’s Indemnity Act of 1951, 38 U.S.C.A. § 851 et seq. The court entered a judgment directing the United States to pay the indemnity to specified parties and to pay a fee to the attorneys of the successful parties. It is evident from a careful examination of the relevant statutes that unlike the National Service Life Insurance Act, 38 U.S.C.A. § 817, a district court is withbut jurisdiction to review an award made by the Administrator of Veterans’ Affairs under the Servicemen’s Indemnity Act of 1951, 38 U.S.C.A. § lla-2. See Brewer v. United States, D.C.Tenn., 117 F.Supp. 842. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is reversed with direction to dismiss the complaint.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
216 F.2d 440, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-henry-houston-janie-pearl-houston-and-mary-houston-ca6-1954.