United States v. Henry Grady Whitehead, Sr., Armel Dayton O'Neal and Lamarr C. Bailey
This text of 438 F.2d 123 (United States v. Henry Grady Whitehead, Sr., Armel Dayton O'Neal and Lamarr C. Bailey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
438 F.2d 123
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Henry Grady WHITEHEAD, Sr., Armel Dayton O'Neal and Lamarr
C. Bailey, Defendants-Appellants.
No. 29498.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Feb. 4, 1971
Rehearing Denied March 1, 1971
Certiorari Denied May 17, 1971
See 91 S.Ct. 1667.
C. O. McMillan, Stephenville, Tex., for Whitehead and O'Neal.
Lamarr Carlysle Bailey, pro se.
W. E. Smith, Asst. U.S. Atty., Eldon B. Mahon, U.S. Atty., Frank C. McCown, Asst. U.S. Atty., Fort Worth, Tex., for appellee.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas; Leo Brewster, Judge.
Before JONES, BELL and SIMPSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Affirmed. See Local Rule 21.1
See NLRB v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 5th Cir. 1970, 430 F.2d 966
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
438 F.2d 123, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-henry-grady-whitehead-sr-armel-dayton-oneal-and-lamarr-ca5-1971.