United States v. Henry Ernst
Opinion
Affirmed. See Local Rule 21. 1 , 2 See Lewis v. United States, 385 U.S. 206, 87 S.Ct. 424, 17 L.Ed.2d 312 (1966).
. See NLRB v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 5 Cir. 1970, 430 F.2d 966.
. Appellant asserts as grounds for appeal : (1) the District Court’s refusal to suppress evidence obtained in an allegedly illegal search, (2) denial of defendant’s Motion for Discovery of a government witness’s statement, (3) denial of defendant’s Motion for a Bill of Particulars, (4) failure to exclude hearsay testimony, (5) defective proof of chain of custody of evidence, (6) abuse of discretion in permitting a Secret Service Agent to testify as an expert in recognizing counterfeit currency, (7) insufficiency of the evidence, (8) defective indictment, and (9) the District Court’s refusal to give certain requested jury instructions, including an instruction on the law of entrapment.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
465 F.2d 1403 (United States v. Henry Ernst) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.