United States v. Henry

D.C. Circuit

United States v. Henry

207 F. App'x 3

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided November 16, 2006·No. No. 05-3009·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs by the parties. The Court has determined that the issues presented occasion no need for an opinion. See D.C.Cir. R. 36(b). It is

Ordered And Adjudged that the judgment of the District Court is affirmed.

Pursuant to Rule 36 of this Court, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after the disposition of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. R. 41.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs by the parties. The Court has determined that the issues presented occasion no need for an opinion. See D.C.Cir. R. 36(b). It is

Ordered And Adjudged that the judgment of the District Court is affirmed.

Pursuant to Rule 36 of this Court, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after the disposition of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. R. 41.

United States v. Henry, 207 F. App'x 3 (D.C. Cir. 2006).

Pincite

207 F. App'x 3 (United States v. Henry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related