United States v. Henry

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Henry. Read the opinion of the Court — 288 F.3d 657
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided January 6, 2003·No. 02-30386·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-30386 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ALBERT C. HENRY,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 00-CR-50057-02 -------------------- January 3, 2003

Before JONES, STEWART, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Court-appointed counsel for Albert C. Henry has requested

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Henry has not responded to his

counsel’s motion. Our independent review of counsel’s brief and

the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Counsel’s

motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 02-30386 -2-

further responsibilities, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR.

R. 42.2.

MOTION GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Henry, (5th Cir. 2003).

United States v. Henry (United States v. Henry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)