United States v. Henry

693 F.2d 31

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided November 18, 1982·No. Nos. 81-4107, 81-4254·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion July 14, 1982, 5 Cir., 1982, 680 F.2d 403).

Before CLARK, Chief Judge, BROWN, GEE, RUBIN, REAVLEY, POLITZ, RANDALL, TATE, JOHNSON, WILLIAMS, GARWOOD, JOLLY and HIGGINBOT-HAM, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the [32]*32judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the causes shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion July 14, 1982, 5 Cir., 1982, 680 F.2d 403).

Before CLARK, Chief Judge, BROWN, GEE, RUBIN, REAVLEY, POLITZ, RANDALL, TATE, JOHNSON, WILLIAMS, GARWOOD, JOLLY and HIGGINBOT-HAM, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

United States v. Henry, 693 F.2d 31 (5th Cir. 1982).

Pincite

693 F.2d 31 (United States v. Henry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

State v. Fraser

471 So. 2d 769 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1985)

United States v. Henry

709 F.2d 298 (Fifth Circuit, 1983)

United States v. Richard Bullock Henry, A/K/A Imari Abubakari Obadele, United States of America v. Wayne James, A/K/A Offoga Quaddus, and Thomas Norman, A/K/A Hekima Ana

693 F.2d 31 (Fifth Circuit, 1982)

Opinion

Related