United States v. Henry

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Henry

537 F. App'x 921

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

DecidedOctober 25, 2013

DocketNo. 12-16567

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 537 F. App'x 921 (United States v. Henry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Henry, 537 F. App'x 921 (11th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Tom Dale, counsel for Troy Henry in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Henry’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Tom Dale, counsel for Troy Henry in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Henry’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

537 F. App'x 921, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-henry-ca11-2013.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack